Civic Engagement 2

I think we made some progress during our meeting; we actually somewhat narrowed down our ideas a lot more quickly than I was expecting. I really like the concept of doing something with children and elderly people. I think the contrast and varying experiences we will have through those two outlets will lend itself very well to our specific topic. While I am much more partial to a whole group project, I think that this could allow enough interaction within the group to be effective. I am concerned about the number of people who seemed opposed to the idea of working with elderly people. Though I have some experience with this type of interaction and am comfortable with it, I completely understand others’ unease. I think that it’s reasonable to expect to have to stretch ourselves a bit, but if the project becomes something that some of the members dread then I think it kind of defeats the purpose.

Honestly, though I like the idea of the split project, I really would prefer to do something as a group. Like I said during our meeting, I think the more think we spread ourselves the less effective we’ll be. For instance, if we start our civic engagement project as one group, and then as we get more involved in it we realize there are one or two ways within this one project that we can split, we’ll have that option. On the other hand, if we have only 5 or 6 people working on a project and we think of two specific ways we want to go within that project, it would be a lot less likely to work out. That sounds pretty confusing, I hope I explained that well enough.

As far as our actual ideas for the project, I really, really like the concept of a sports program for kids. There is myriad research that shows how beneficial physical activity is for children. (As a matter of fact, I’m doing a research project loosely based on that concept!!) Not only does it improve self-confidence, but it even affects things such as on-task behavior, academic achievement, and involvement in other extra-curriculars. Some people expressed concern in the meeting that they don’t have any expertise in any sports, but I don’t think we necessarily need to teach “sports” as much as just a combination of physical activity, competition, etc. We can all play nuecum!!

As most of you are, I’m also a bit hesitant to commit to something on a weekly basis. While I’m not sure what else we should do instead, I think we would be better off aiming for something less demanding so that we aren’t burned out after a semester. I’m not sure who brought it up, but I liked the idea of forming groups of 3-4 and just making sure one of the groups was at the site once a week. (I forgot to mention, this is all assuming that we work through an already-established program, which I think is going to be our best bet.) If we have 3 groups then we’ll each be going to the site once every three weeks, which I think is more than reasonable. In addition to this, I think we could do a Saturday event once or twice a semester. This could be the “fundraising” aspect of the project, if we wanted to attempt that.

On-Campus Event, for real this time

I went to the brown bag luncheon about foreign policies in the 2008 campaign. I felt that this was an appropriate event considering the goal of Paideia to “force” us to become more socially/politically/internationally aware of our world. I know it wouldn't really be a stretch for most people, but I'm not quite as politically involved or aware as I should be. Regarding that, this was a pretty interesting event for me. I wish they could have talked a little more about each candidate’s views on foreign policy, just because I'm not very familiar with them. However, I'm sure I was one of the only ones in attendance who needed a review session.

An aspect of the program that I found borderline irritating was the seeming preference of the speakers for Obama. Although it’s something that I’ve come to expect from Southwestern, and I’m aware that everyone has their own political interests, I think that events such as this one should remain completely objective. While I am by no means a die-hard Republican, nor am I anti-Obama, I would still like to listen to a lecture about the potential presidents with both sides equally presented. This wasn’t, however, and overwhelming issue and I believe that overall I benefited from the experience.

One thing I was particularly interested in was the emphasis the speakers put on Pakistan and the danger it poses. Their argument was that, since Pakistan has developed nuclear bombs their potential threat to us and other countries has drastically increased. I really hadn't considered this as an issue and I'm glad they brought it up.

A question was asked about the opinions/preferences of foreign countries as far as our next leader and how the speakers thought the election of either of the candidates would affect that opinion. Again, I am not as politically knowledgeable as I should be, but this question really got me thinking about America’s role in the world, which led to my thinking about my own role in the world, which is a thought I believe Paideia is supposed to stimulate, often. Though I came to no mind-blowing conclusion, I did decide that one of my roles in the world is to be an informed citizen; one with opinions about what’s happening around me, as well as a desire to do what I can to affect those things about which I have opinions. (That has to be a run-on sentence)

In general, my knowledge about the political situation has really improved since I started Paideia, which is definitely something that needed to happen. Between our discussions and reading Newsweek I feel much more informed about the goings-on of the world and the US. However, I still have much more room to improve, and I think that the various aspects of Paideia, as well as the ways in which I can expand on those aspects, will help achieve that goal.

For me, civic engagement is participating in or creating some activity that benefits someone not directly connected to you. I feel like this is different than doing something that helps a person or group close to you. I really don't think there's a strict limit to what counts as civic engagement, and while I don't think it's synonymous with community service I don't see a huge difference.
As far as our own cohort is concerned, I feel like we have a good amount of resources and commitment and that we should be able to do something fairly significant. We're all pretty dedicated people and if we can find something that we all want to commit to, I don't see any reason why we couldn't do something really great. Personally, I'd like to do something with a tangible result, but that's just me being selfish and wanting to physically see the results of our hard work.
I've always had a passion for working with kids. I've purposefully surrounded myself with kids as often as possible for most of my life. In addition to my personal interest, though, I think doing something that benefits children is always a good bet because they still have so much time to change their paths, if they even need to be changed. Another area that interests me for civic engagement is low-income families and neighborhoods. The cyclical nature of this issue makes it such an obvious possibility for me because making one simple difference in a life can completely change the cycle.
One of the main challenges a foresee is coming with a goal that we can all agree on. I think it's become obvious that we're a very opinionated group and I know that will each have our own ideas that we're passionate about. Also, one thing that happens to me pretty often is setting an unrealistic goal. I'm not sure if this will present a problem as a group but I know that I've often encountered it. While I think that we're capable of coming up with something really meaningful, I don't want us to aim for something and then realize that we just don't have the time/money/resources a year into the project.
Overall I'm excited about starting to brainstorm, I'm pretty interested in hearing everyone's ideas.

On Campus Event: Campaign luncheon

I went to the brown bag luncheon about foreign policies in the 2008 campaign. I know it wouldn't really be a stretch for most people, but I'm not quite as politically involved or aware as I should be. Regarding that, this was a pretty interesting event for me. I wish they could have talked a little more about each candidates views on foreign policy, just because I'm not very familiar with them. However, I'm sure I was one of the only ones in attendance who needed a review session.
One thing I was particularly interested in was the emphasis the speakers put on Pakistan and the danger it poses. Their argument was that, since Pakistan has developed nuclear bombs their potential threat to us and other countries has drastically increased. I really hadn't considered this as an issue and I'm glad they brought it up.
My knowledge about the political situation has really improved since I started Paideia, which is definitely something that needed to happen. Between our discussions and reading Newsweek I feel much more informed about the goings-on of the world and the US, though I could still use some improvement.

I wish that we would have had some more time to discuss my topic, but I think it went well. The majority of our discussions could last for days so I was expecting that. One thing I wanted to bring up that I didn't have time to was the percentage of black men who no longer have their voting rights, about 1.4 million or 13%. I'm interested in what everyone thinks about this. I was torn between two thoughts. The first is that ex-convicts should have to deal with the consequences of their crime. The second, however, was pure astonishment that so many members of a demographic are not represented in the voting process. I'm not sure what the laws are regarding this topic, but I think that after a certain amount of time voting rights should be regained.
Another issue I wanted to bring up was the comment about the cyclic nature of this issue. (Parents go to jail, are no longer around to raise their children, these children are then "more likely" to commit crimes themselves, etc. etc.) This reminds me of the cycle of low-income families and a lack of education. In my FYS (The Quest for Educational Equality in America) we discussed this at length and it really interests me as a possible venue for our service project. I know we haven't really started sharing our ideas yet but this article presented a good motivator for me to start brainstorming.

Study Abroad

I'm pretty positive that I'll be studying abroad in Buenos Aires, Argentina for a 6-week summer program. The obvious way this fits into my education at SU is through my Spanish minor; after completing the Buenos Aires program I'll only be 1-2 credits short of the minor. I also know that I really don't have any hope at fluency unless I spend some time immersed in the language. I feel that this will be helpful in almost any career I choose, not to mention that I would just love to be completely fluent in another language.
More than that, however, I think that studying abroad is a very appropriate part of a Liberal Arts degree. There are few better ways to broaden your horizons than by spending time in a country and culture and with a family all completely foreign to you. I know that this will give me so much more perspective on my life and others' than I could ever acquire in Georgetown or Temple, TX. I spent two weeks in Jamaica this summer on a service learning trip and the impact that trip had on me is invalueable. I can only imagine how much I could gain in a six week trip. I love learning about other cultures and seeing the similarities and differences, specifically the family dynamics. I find it so interesting to see the things parents teach their children to value and to spend time with a family in their normal, casual lives.
I think this aspect fits well into the Paideia program in that it strives to ensure that its students are well informed about the world around them and have plenty of experiences with that world. In addition to this, studying abroad will also help to make me much more self-sufficient, another characteristic I beleive Paideia values. Being forced to rely on only myself, and in another country with another language at that, will be an enormous task for me. However, I know that when I leave the country and I am completely confident in myself and my ability to survive in unfamiliar situations it will all be worth it.
My primary concern with studying abroad is time. Since I switched my major this summer, I am bit behind and my schedule has to be somewhat strict (and full) for the next 3 years. In addition to studying abroad, I need to take at least one class this summer, and take more classes and find an internship during the next summer. It's a little stressful wondering if I'll be able to fit everthing in, but I really don't want to give up my Buenos Aires trip, not that I really have a choice.

What I Expect from Paideia

I first heard about Paideia from Dr. Hunt, who was my FYS professor. The prospect of being with one group of students and one professor for three years really appealed to me as it was still the beginning of my first year and I was missing the close knit group of friends I'd always had. My interest was solidified when I discovered the study abroad and civic engagement requirements, two things that I desperately need to do but may or may not have followed through with on my own. The Understanding Human Behavior theme intrigiued me because I feel like regardless of the field in which I end up, I'll have to interact with humans, so I might as well attempt to understand them.
I really hope to broaden my perspectives with Paideia, both through the diversity of our cohort and as a result of the different requirements. I also want to strive to have a well-rounded college experience, which I believe will be made easier through Paideia.
As of now, my plan is to study abroad in Argentina this summer. I'm attempting a Spanish minor, so this would be practical as well as really really enjoyable. Honestly, the prospect of spending a semester abroad is a bit intimidating to me, not to mention the fact that I'm not sure my schedule would allow it.
I would really like to do a project centering around the world of education. There are numerous teachers in my family and I've grown up being taught the value of an education. Also, with my FYS (The Quest for Educational Equality in America) my eyes were opened to the devastating gaps in the quality of educations children are receiving today.
My only worries are just of time management and commitment; I'm not positive that I'll be able to devote the amount of time I should to Paideia, though I'm going to try.